Why do individuals and the media continue discussing the Iraq situation? OK, it seems ridiculous for me to suggest that we completely ignore what may be an important turning point (DOWNWARD turning point) for America's foreign policy and image in the world at large, as well as an event which may cost thousans of American lives. But here's the facts, folks: we don't live in a pure democracy, but rather a representative republic with our DELEGATES determined via democratic vote. Not so long ago, these elected delegates basically turned over the power to attack Iraq to none other than Mr. George Dubya Bush, our beloved (by the uneducated, mind-numbingly easy-to-convince portion of the population, anyway) president. What this essentially means is that the individuals who supposedly speak for the people of America in our government's affairs have voluntarily silenced themselves on this issue. In short, we the people literally have NO CONTROL over what happens in the Iraq conflict-to-be (and believe me, it WILL be). So why do we bother debating back and forth on it? Is it justified, is it moral, is it worth the risk? IT DOESN'T MATTER. We can't stop the now-inevitable waste of American lives in the Persian Gulf. Anyone who DOES disagree will just have to wait until 2004 to make their voice heard, and then I can all but guarantee it will be again stifled, this time by the aforementioned uneducated masses combined with the proven power of our Fearless Leader to manipulate the voting system to his advantage.
End rant, return to normality.